INTERCULTURAL RELATIONS OF SOME TRIBES IN INDONESIA
Introduction
Indonesia
is the archipelago country that has many islands. This makes Indonesia rich of
the diversity. There are many tribes that live in Indonesia. There are
Javanese, Sundanese, Batak, Bugis, Balinese, and so on. Each tribe has the
characteristics itself. One of the differences is culture. Every tribe has
culture that is still depending until now, for example, Javanese has culture
such as politeness and speak slowly to old people. Javanese language is also
slow, it differ to Batak language. Batak language is hard.
Culture
is the creation of human; it can be in the material, language, and ideas. There
are many definitions of the culture. The behaviorist stated culture is
something which is shared and can be observed. The functionalist defined
culture as an attempt at making sense out of social behaviors, such as
language, gestures, customs or habits, and foods. The other definition of
culture is not a material phenomenon; it is a dynamic inter-relationship
between meaning, experience, and reality. According to Edward Hall (1959),
culture is the sum total of a way of life of a people (Gail,1985:12).
When
we use the term "culture" it is important to bear in mind that
culturally attributed social interaction processes are themselves the result of
socially constructed processes. They are part of an individual-collective
dialectic with multiple potential meanings, which are emergent and in constant
reformulation from a wide variety of social and cultural perspectives. Much of
the recent research in intercultural communication has been directed towards
the study of these systems of culturally related meanings.
The
differences of many tribes in Indonesia can be positive and negative. Indonesia
become the rich country of the cultures, it is one of the positive effect from
many provinces and tribes in Indonesia. The negative effects of the differences
of culture are culture shock, feeling afraid to other tribes, even conflict. To
prevent these problems, it is important to learn and understand other cultures.
Understanding is the positive reactions to and interactions with people from
different cultures. Porter and Samovar
stated about intercultural communication:
Intercultural communication is
fairly easy when it is “cognitive” or based on what we know, but experiential
communication is nearly impossible because it is based on what we feel…(Gail,1985:11).
Intercultural
communication competence (ICC) is an area of study that is becoming more
relevant in the increasingly multicultural communities that we live in. The
term, intercultural identity, is employed as a counterpoint to, and as an
extension of, cultural identity, and as a concept that represents the phenomenon
of identity adaptation and transformation beyond the perimeters of the
conventional, categorical conception of cultural identity. The intercultural
communication competence can make good intercultural relations between tribes
in Indonesia.
Intercultural Relation
An intercultural relation is a relatively new formal field of
social science studies. It deals with the ability to
get along with others, especially those from a different cultural background. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intercultural_relations
Some of the main topics of study are:
- reflection and development
of cultural competence
- analyzing different cultural
patterns in the world
- finding strategies for
adapting
- solving problems in intercultural
communication
- teaching social skills to reduce cultural misunderstandings
- studying the lifelong impact
of youth and other exchanges
The Bennett
scale, also called the DMIS (for Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity), was developed by Dr. Milton
Bennett. The framework describes the different ways in which people can
react to cultural differences. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Developmental_Model_of_Intercultural_Sensitivity_%28DMIS%29
Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity
- Denial of
Difference
- Individuals
experience their own culture as the only “real” one. Other cultures are
either not noticed at all or are understood in an undifferentiated,
simplistic manner. People at this position are generally uninterested in
cultural difference, but when confronted with difference their seemingly
benign acceptance may change to aggressive attempts to avoid or eliminate
it.
- Defense
against Difference
- One’s
own culture is experienced as the most “evolved” or best way to live.
This position is characterized by dualistic us/them thinking and
frequently accompanied by overt negative stereotyping. People at this
position are more openly threatened by cultural difference and more
likely to be acting aggressively against it. A variation at this position
is seen in reversal where one’s own culture is devalued and another
culture is romanticized as superior.
- Minimization
of Difference
- The
experience of similarity outweighs the experience of difference. People
recognize superficial cultural differences in food, customs, etc, but
they emphasize human similarity in physical structure, psychological
needs, and/or assumed adherence to universal values. People at this
position are likely to assume that they are no longer ethnocentric, and
they tend to overestimate their tolerance while underestimating the
effect (e.g. “privilege”) of their own culture.
- Acceptance of
difference
- One’s
own culture is experienced as one of a number of equally complex
worldviews. People at this position accept the existence of culturally
different ways of organizing human existence, although they do not
necessarily like or agree with every way. They can identify how culture
affects a wide range of human experience and they have a framework for
organizing observations of cultural difference.
- Adaptation to
Difference
- Individuals
are able to expand their own worldviews to accurately understand other
cultures and behave in a variety of culturally appropriate ways.
Effective use of empathy, or frame of reference shifting, to understand
and be understood across cultural boundaries.
- Integration of
Difference
- One’s
experience of self is expanded to include the movement in and out of
different cultural worldviews. People at this position have a definition
of self that is “marginal” (not central) to any particular culture,
allowing this individual to shift rather smoothly from one cultural
worldview to another.
Conclusion
Intercultural
relations must be developed to increase the conflict between tribes in
Indonesia. It is interesting to learn about cultures because we can respect and
tolerance to other people that has cultural differences.
References
Robinson,
Gail L Nemetz. 1985. Crosscultural
Understanding. California: Pergamon Press.
Komentar
Posting Komentar